| |
|
The Exsultet (the Easter Proclamation or Praeconium Paschale)
is heralded as the liturgy's best poetry and acclaimed as the
Mother of all Chants; it's also considered long, tedious, challenging,
and daunting even for the most seasoned professional. The
hymn soars to liturgical heights but clearly is not for the faint
of heart.
That's from the proclaimer's point of view. From the
prayer's point of view, it's all good . . . if the proclamation is
done well. So we're back where we started. The Exsultet must be
sung well to be prayed well. And praying it is why we proclaim it.
Before and besides everything else, the Exsultet is a prayer of the
Church—exuberant, ecstatic, pastoral—radiating from the
mind and heart of true believers, expressing joy and gratitude.
We begin the Vigil with this prayer that sets the tone for
the grand liturgy that follows. Sung during the Service of Light,
it fixes our eyes on the light who overcame the darkness of the
underworld and the darkness in human hearts; it sings not only
of Christ our Savior, but of doorposts and blood, fire and prison
bars, wax and bees. It conjures our greatest events, it uses our
finest language, it blends the things of heaven with those of
earth in unparalleled ways, and it calls us to understand and celebrate
the sources of the joy that imbues the Easter celebration.
The Exsultet is proclaimed but once a year and, as we've
noted, its efficacy hinges on its excellent proclamation by priest,
deacon, or cantor. But just as the one who gives it voice must
prepare to proclaim it, so we who will hear it (and sing its acclamations)
must prepare to pray it within the liturgy. It's really too
much to expect that we can enter the Vigil, in the midst of an
engorged assembly, and so focus ourselves as to truly attend to a
lengthy and unfamiliar proclamation, hoping the singer's best
effort will become our fervent prayer.
The odds of praying the Exsultet authentically will be
much greater if we have journeyed through the weeks of Lent
with the Christ whose victory we celebrate and share; if we have
fasted with him from the things that distract us and those that
demean us; if we have abjured, like him, the smallness that so
often claims us; if, with him, we have walked into a garden where
our souls, pressed like olives, yield the fragrant oil of repentance.
By feasting on his Word and savoring its nourishment, we will
reach the Vigil ready, like him, to leave the domain of death
and enter the halls of light that blaze with the "lightening of
his glory."
A prayer as dense and rich as this should be pondered
more than once a year. Our hearts should alight among its
branches when we have time to sit and savor, space to reflect,
and the urge to plumb the mysteries of this season. After all, the
Exsultet presents the one who rose as the Lord of Glory who
stared death in the face and bore the unimaginable weight of
human sin upon his back. This "glorious redeemer" seeks disciples
who understand the depth of God's love and yearn to live
within its contours.
Lectio Divina, the ancient process of focusing on and uniting
with God's Word, provides a method for claiming this prayer
and integrating it into our observance of the Paschal feast. Lectio invites us to read and read again, so that the words we ponder
will have a chance to etch themselves upon us. Unlike the reading
we do for work, or school, or as we sip coffee and eye the
clock before heading off to work, Lectio requires us to "take it
slow" and realize that the journey is the destination. We don't
read to acquire knowledge or be entertained, but simply to spend
time with God. It's an uncomplicated goal. Like the family pet
that settles at his master's feet or the lover who takes comfort in
sitting beside her beloved, we let the words of the text provide an
opportunity to rest in the Lord's presence. And as we do, we
acquire the mind of God and begin to see things anew.
A thoughtful contemplation of the Exsultet takes us to a radically
new understanding of time. Our normal categories of time
are completely blurred within this prayer. The ancient authors of
the Exsultet had intuitions that today's most cutting-edge scientists
are affirming: time, as we know it, doesn't exist. Our liturgical
theology has always expressed that conviction. When we
proclaim scripture within the liturgy, we are not simply remembering
a past event, nor are we re-creating it. Rather, we are
experiencing the original moment; we are as present to the saving
acts being recounted as were Moses and the Israelites, Jesus
and the disciples, and the crowds who witnessed the marvelous
deeds of God.
When the Exsultet states, "This is the night," it does not
mean "that" was the night—that night long ago when Israel traversed
the sea or when Jesus lay in the tomb. No, this night as we
gather with neighbors around our font and in our pews, this
very night is the night when waters part, and the pillar leads the
way, when Christ shatters the "prison-bars of death" and rises
triumphant from the realm of sin and darkness. In the liturgical
economy in which we participate, time collapses and yields
to greater realities—mysterious, divine realities we can only
dimly perceive.
Not until Einstein did the tyranny of time become scientifically
suspect. Newton had asserted that time was absolute
and that it flowed independently of any external factors. But
Einstein came along one hundred years ago and disproved the
autonomy of time. His theory of relativity not only proposes that
there is no clear, specific "present," but also that "all moments of
time are equally real." In 1955 Einstein asserted that physicists
like himself understood that "the distinction between past, present,
and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion."1
What scientists have only recently understood, our ancestors
in faith have long since intuited: past and present are one.
Old and New Testaments are one. Our history and our destiny
are one. They don't become one on this night while remaining
distinct throughout the rest of the year. On this night they are
more clearly revealed as one, for one is what they always are.
This night we perceive and understand more clearly that the
fullness of Christ's victory is already present, even in the incompleteness
of our daily striving, that we live within what Christ
and his precursors did for us, that we live within the struggle
and the victory we misperceive as "past," and that we live within
the glory and the light we misperceive as "future." This is the
night that helps us understand that the "persistent illusion"
won't always delude us and that, one day, we will grasp fully the
eternal now that is the nature of God.
Another dramatic reversal embedded in the Exsultet relates to
the perception of our primeval affliction as the stained children
of Adam and Eve. The prayer doesn't try to overturn our ancient
conviction that we have inherited an inclination to things that
are not of God. It doesn't substitute original blessing for original
sin. Instead, it unapologetically celebrates the primordial
moment that necessitated the intervention of our merciful God.
Rather than regretting the "Fall" and all that was lost, this astute
prayer points to the wonder of God's becoming human.
Incarnation and salvation are not two separate moments in time,
but forever and irremediably one. The joy of this night that culminates
millennia of God's perduring mercy would not glow
with the wattage of lightening were it not for that "happy fault"
that we were taught to mourn and have worn as a mark of shame.
Saint Paul proclaims unconditionally that God works all
things for the good of those who love him. The Exsultet echoes
that refrain and boldly claims that even sin brings blessing.
Because we are not God, it takes darkness for us to fully appreciate
light and our frail humanity can appreciate fulfillment only
after waiting. So humanity has been no stranger to longing and
darkness. But was God playing some cosmic game with us? Have
we mourned the taint of sin for nothing? If our original parents'
transgression was "truly necessary," why the guilt and why the
consequences that have weighed so heavily upon us?
Rich poetry consists of layers of meaning and offers much
on which to reflect. If its truth were readily apparent, it would be
more prose than poetry. What distinguishes poetry from other
writing is the effort the reader must put forth to understand.
Poetry is our finest fare, and like gourmet food, it must be eaten
slowly or its subtleties are lost. A year of reflection would not
exhaust the mystery asserted in the stark and startling phrases:
"O, happy fault . . . O truly necessary sin of Adam." Perhaps it
would appear to be a divine diversion, even a perverse amusement,
for God to construct a world in which Adam's sin is truly
"necessary," were it not also true that the "death of Christ"
destroyed that sin "completely."
The potent truth Saint Paul asserts in the eighth chapter of
Romans is more elusive than it is apparent: Do all things truly
work together for good? Our experience often testifies to the
contrary. The Exsultet doesn't stop to debate the point. It simply
stops us in our tracks and declares, without mitigation, that personal
experience is not normative: we can be fooled, it tells us.
We regularly misunderstand; we misconstrue with great consistency
and, sadly, with an even greater conviction that we are
right. The blessed and revolutionary alliance of "happy" and
"fault," of "necessary" and "sin" catch us up short. Think again,
these words challenge. Let God's logic overwhelm you and
accept the grace of contradiction. After all, God's ways are not
our ways, says the Lord.
The revision of The Roman Missal reintroduces to the Exsultet
the mention of bees and enthusiastic praise of their productive
work. The more ancient texts of the prayer went to greater
lengths to extol the contributions of these industrious insects.
Left out of the English translation of the 1970 Missal, the bees
are back, thanks to the greater attention to literal translation.
But the return of the bees is less about translation than it is
about mysticism. The relationship of liturgy and theology is like
the relationship between poetry and prose—they say similar
things but in radically different ways. Liturgy chooses the language
of mysticism, and the Exsultet is a happy example of a
mystical approach to dogmas that seem more suited to the syllabi
of theologians. In praying the Exsultet, we leave the stratosphere
of theology and enter the warm regions of mysticism.
We've already seen how the repetition of "This is the night . . ."
speaks of the collapse of time. Now, we see how allusions to bees
point indirectly to the mystery of our union in Christ and
debunk the fallacy of autonomous living.
Long before John Donne expressed it in his poetry, the
verses of the Exsultet were announcing that "no man is an
island." The "work of bees" is communal work. The life of bees is
also communal, revolving around the "queen" or "mother" bee.
The colony's existence depends on numbers, sharing and cooperation,
and on everyone doing their job. Ancients considered
bees a model of the perfect society. It is the fruit of their joint
labor that yields the precious candle this song-prayer was composed
to extol.
In this candle, Old and New Covenants meet, for the pillar
of wax is a type of pillar of fire that led Israel by night through the
desert wilderness. As a burnt offering, the candle is also a type
of Christ, marked as it is with five (usually red) grains of incense
representing the five wounds of Jesus's Passion. This candle produces
a fire that "is never dimmed by the sharing of its light."
The same can be said of love and of the sharing of our faith. No
matter how much we give away, we never have less.
This prayer we hear but once a year offers opportunity for
much reflection if we are willing to sit awhile and listen. Other
words or images might touch you more than the ones discussed
here. What speaks to you this year might not be what moves you
the next time you ponder this rich text. As Lent approaches, you
might consider walking through the season mindful that it will
end with this glorious prayer that presents us with glowing
truths and profound challenges. Long before the Vigil, as you
move through Lent's five weeks, you may want to ponder questions
prompted by the Exsultet's grand imagery. Perhaps questions
like the following may lead to fruitful contemplation:
 |
How do I feel about the possibility that time as I know it
does not really exist? Can I conceive of non-linear time? Do
I find comfort in the notion of the eternal now, or am I
more comfortable in a segmented universe where past is
past and the future still to come? Can I believe, as I celebrate
the Vigil, that what we call "past" and "future," are
present in this one night?
Do the mysteries of this night shift my perception of reality?
How do I feel about this prayer's assertion that Adam's
sin was "necessary," and that his "fault" and ours is, in
some mysterious way, a "happy fault?"
What does the melting pillar say to me about my life? Am I
called to be a burnt-sacrifice? What does the life of industry,
single-mindedness, and unshakable community that
characterizes bees say to me about my commitments? Do I
conceive of my life as radically intertwined and connected
with the lives of all who share this planet? Do my relationships—to others and to God—define my life? |
Thoughtful time spent in the garden of poetry and praise
that is the Exsultet not only brings insight and opportunity for
deep prayer but also readies us to join our faith community at
the Vigil and sing with them and the "Angel ministers of God"
the praises of the Easter candle ?and of the one whose light it
only dimly represents.
Notes
- “Newsflash: Time May Not Exist,” by Tim Folger, Discover
Magazine, http://discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/in-no-time/article_view?b_start:int=1&-C=
|
|
|